Electronically Hijacked and Remotely Controlled
09-13-24
mpg
Were
the 9/11 Aircraft Electronically Hijacked and Remotely
Controlled? - Yes!!
For The Historical Record - Previously posted,
posted again for your edification - A
quote...."According to the global grassroots organization
9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers website (https://911pilots.org/),
there were no Muslim hijackers at the controls of the 9/11
aircraft.....
Well.... that's a slight exaggeration. There
were definitely 19 patsies, some of whom were
Muslim. They were probably told they were engaging
in an Entebbe styled hijacking, where their planes would
be remotely flown to an airport, the hostages taken off,
and then the planes were to be blown up (to hide their
remote control equipment).
Similar to where the planes used in the Dawson
Field Hijackings were blown up. In that case
as a statement. (Oddly enough, only three
were blown up, and one was successfully liberated.
Sort of like the buildings on 9/11, where three were hit
with planes, and one was not)
At which point they'd trade the hostages from the hijacked
planes, in exchange for their political demands being met,
(which were probably designed to be minor, so they
wouldn't be politically embarassing) and then the
hijackers would be flown out of the country on another
plane.
At least that's probably the 'plausible' plan the jews
sketched out for their American accomplices in the US
Government. A nice staged false-flag that was most
likely intended to be used to finally finish off Iraq's
Saddam Hussein. Their nation-state authoritarian nemesis.
Unfinished business that Bush One left on the table after
Gulf War One.
Unfinished business that truly irked the jews to no
end.
Business that would finally be finished by a false flag
which would be massively more successful then their prior
failed attempt to do the same almost ten years
earlier. When the jews arranged the 1993
WTC bombing.
No doubt many of the traitors in the US Government were
surprised when
the planes were actually remoted directly into their
targets, (except flight 93, which had to be shot
down, or remoted into the ground, when the passengers
gained control. It wouldn't do to have a plane full
of remote control gear, and surprised patsies appear on
the news).
Surprised because the jews' actual plan, as it turned out,
was MUCH more ambitious.
The destruction of "Seven countries in Five years".
Without doubt the hijackers themselves were even
more surprised as WTC1, WTC2 and the Pentagon loomed up in
front of them.
52
story high WTC7 was an embarrassing failure and had
to be obviously demolished in it's own footprint like WTC1
& WTC2, (the jews really learned from their failure in
1993, and had made absolutely sure this time it was going
to be a successfull series of controlled
demolitions), but in the case of WTC7, sans the cover
of an impacting airplane, when Flight 93 failed
to show up for its final "shock
opera" Dénouement
of 9/11. Demonstrating that false-flags don't always go
off as planned.
By then of course it was too late to do anything.
Thousands of American officials were now deeply and
traitorously implicated in helping to carry
out 9/11. They were now left with no choice
but to follow through, and carry out the jews' PNAC
Protocols.
Which they've done assiduously to this very day.... mpg
"....but that these aircraft were electronically hijacked
and remotely controlled through employment of a system
called the uninterruptible autopilot that enables a remote
source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot
and flight management computer and remotely guide it to its
target destination. Once engaged, the pilots cannot
disconnect this system - According to the 9/11 Commission,
the alleged hijackers had never flown the sophisticated
B-757 and B-767 aircraft in their lives but were mainly
trained in light, single engine Cessna 172s and the like."
9/11 Memorial Sections by Year
|