The Rules of Force
09-28-12
mpg
Website editor's clarification: Attacking
military installations or government officials is not
"terrorism" per-se.
It should be emphasized that the weight of proof is ALWAYS
against the aggressor regarding any sort of
military action. Cavalier policies and self-serving
statements such as "preemption", or completely and totally
ridiculous statements such as "we're bringing them freedom
and democracy" or "mission to protect" do not reduce this
burden of proof, in fact they only increase it. To
wit....
"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is
not only an international crime; it is the supreme
international crime differing only from other war
crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated
evil of the whole." -- *Robert H. Jackson*, chief
prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials
Nuremberg
Principle VI(a), states the following....
- (i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a
war of aggression or a war in violation of international
treaties, agreements or assurances;
- (ii) Participation in a common plan or
conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the
acts mentioned under (i). [Such as a false flag]
Generally the following rules should be applied....
Terrorism -- Is the deliberately random,
unpredictable, unexpected and systematic use of
organized violence, (which includes torture) against
civilian targets (almost always to kill, hurt or maim) to
induce fear or terror in, and submission by the populace to
the perpetrator's goals (the perpetrator being individuals,
groups or governments), or to incapacitate and break-down
the society's governing structures, or in many cases, to
deliberately induce a state of civil war, anarchy or
sectarian conflict within a given society.
- Terrorism is a crime -- it is a tactic -- you can NOT
make a "war" on terror -- and it is not an "act of
war" itself unless conducted or facilitated by a state
actor.
- Therefore all perpetrators should be arrested and
tried publicly under the rules
of evidence and Habeas
Corpus to determine the responsible parties
with the exception being actual on-going invasions or
territorial incursions (see below).
- Terrorism, when committed by a nation state is a war
crime, and its leaders and those who follow their
orders or those who facilitated such attacks should be
treated and tried as war criminals.
- Terrorism, when committed by non-state actors is first
degree murder and the perpetrators should be treated and
brought to trial as such.
Sabotage / Murder / Invasion -- Attacks against
military installations or against government officials with
the intent to kill by invading, foreign, out-of-uniform,
mercenaries supported by foreign states without a
declaration of war, or acts of terror against
the state's civilian population, should be considered,
murder / sabotage / terrorism on behalf of a foreign power,
or foreign powers.
- It is an act of war by foreigners without the
protection of the Geneva
conventions.
- The same applies for acts of terrorism committed during
an invasion or territorial
incursion by such foreign forces.
- Which essentially means the perpetrators can be
executed at will (summarily shot for example) if they're
not the citizens of the country they're attacking.
- If they are that country's citizens they must be
imprisoned and publicly tried for the crime of treason,
or terrorism, or both, under the rules
of evidence and Habeas
Corpus
Legitimate Resistance -- Attacks against foreign
military installations or personnel with the intent to kill,
or against foreign government officials who are militarily
occupying a country, or their collaborators, by
that countries native population is almost ALWAYS
considered to be legitimate resistance and NOT an
act of terrorism. There are exceptions. Attacks are
not allowed during flags of truce, against foreign
ambassadors, foreign medical personnel, the press, etc.
- It is the right of a people to defend their homeland.
- It is the right of a people to resist foreign
occupation.
- It is the right of a people to rule themselves.
- Acts of terrorism in support of resistance are NEVER
acceptable.
Revolutions -- Generally attacks by citizens against
their government should follow
this declaration....
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that
all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these
are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. -
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted
among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent
of the governed...."
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive
of these ends it is the Right of the People to alter
or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,
laying its foundation on such principles and organizing
its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely
to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence,
indeed, will dictate that Governments long established
should not be changed for light and transient causes;
and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind
are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable,
than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which
they are accustomed."
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them
under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their
duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new
Guards for their future security...."
- It is the right, nay the duty, of a people to change
their form of government under certain circumstances
and given unbearable provocations.
- It should NEVER be attempted for "light or transient
causes".
- It should NEVER, EVER, be attempted at the
BEHEST of a foreign power. It should be considered
as an act of treason if one should do so.
- It is extremely problematical to seek assistance from
foreign powers if the "revolution" in any way, shape, or
form, is planned, directed or assisted by such powers to
further their own goals and agendas.
- Specifically the looting of the targeted nation's
resources or wealth.
- Or to eliminate or destroy the targeted nation-state
as a a geo-political and/or economic competitor to a
foreign power or powers. (The HIGHEST form of
treason any citizen of a nation-state can EVER
commit.)
- Such attempts to overturn or destroy an existing
government are commonly referred to as foreign sponsored
Coup d'états, or acts of subversion, and are considered
to be treason by almost everyone everywhere.
- Acts of terrorism in support of a revolution are NEVER
acceptable
- Attacks against military installations or against
government officials with the intent to kill MAY be
acceptable in a revolution.
Secessionist or Irredentist
Movements:
Generally the rules outlined above in the "Revolutions"
section apply to secession, accept the standards are even
higher since secession involves the actual break-up of a
nation-state, which usually involves even more trauma, death
and destruction than that of a revolution.
And they're even higher regarding Irredentist Movements
since these are almost always encouraged by the foreign
power the secessionists wish to co-join with, adhere to, or
are acting on behalf of....mpg
See also....
The Rules of Force II - (Or how NOT to
kill the messenger) - 12-15-12 - mpg
The Rules of Force III - Volunteering In
Conflict Zones - 08-21-14 - mpg
|