They're ALL "Conspiracy Theories"


They're ALL "Conspiracy Theories"
10-20-10
mpg

Trades Hall president Kevin Bracken calls 9/11 'conspiracy'
A quote...."THE president of the Victorian Trades Hall has sparked outrage after controversially claiming the September 11 2001 World Trade Centre attacks were a conspiracy, not the result of terrorist activity." - bold by website editor - also posted at DProgram -- Topix ||  Reficultnias's 9/11 Central  ||

The sentence shown above is really stupid, hopefully it doesn't reflect the mental capacity of the Daily Telegraph's readership.

Is the Daily Telegraph suggesting a terrorist act is not a conspiracy? Or a conspiracy can't be a terrorist act? Or if the United States Government helped facilitate the murder of almost three thousand of its own citizens it wasn't an act of terrorism?!?!

FYI
for The Daily Telegraph and their readership, a "conspiracy" is defined as "a secret plan between two or more parties to carry out an act, usually an illegal act".

9/11 is simply the date that act occurred, on that date the Twin Towers and WT7 were definitely destroyed and the Pentagon was definitely attacked. No one disputes that and since everyone knew it happened, because they saw it happen, when it happened -- these acts are not, and could never be, a conspiracy.

What a conspiracy is -- is the planning -- in secret -- by those who plotted, ordered and carried out the attacks of 9/11. Which means that ALL the theories on how 9/11 happened , such as the destruction of the buildings on that fateful day for example, every single one of them, are "conspiracy" theories.  Including those ridiculous and highly implausible "official" theories put forward by the Government.

Unless of course The Daily Telegraphs is suggesting that those who planned and carried out 9/11 weren't in a conspiracy, i.e. "a secret act between two or more parties", because....

A) The Government know about it all along and let it happen, therefore it wasn't a secret to them or....
B) The Government did it itself and therefore it wasn't a secret to itself. Or perhaps....
C) The Daily Telegraph knew about the planning regarding 9/11 and it wasn't a secret to the Daily Telegraph?

If that wasn't what was meant perhaps we could all try to use the English language as it was intended, with a little bit more precision....thank you very much. - mpg