M.P.G.
San Francisco, CA.
Losing One's Faith 9/11 & Iraq
First mailing sent
05-26-2004
I have respectfully sent
this letter, more of a treatise or manifesto actually, in the hope that
one person, just one, will be encouraged to investigate the motives of
those in power who took this nation to war. Not the facts, not how it
happened, for that is already out there for all to see, but why it
happened. I am a terrible writer and this is only the second letter
I've sent to anyone besides friends and family, never the less I feel
obligated to say something about the horror that is being done in the
name of this country.
I realize it's to long and
it probably doesn't meet your standards for publication, however I do
hope it will start some of you thinking. No acknowledgement needed for
publication or distribution. Share it with those who would be
interested.
If you wish a street
address or phone number please e-mail me with your request.
Losing One's Faith : 9/11
& Iraq 05-24-2004
Faith Betrayed : by M. P.
G.
For many years I was a
believer, I believed in America, I believed the evil things this
country did in the past were always done by a small selfish minority
and that the vast majority of it's citizens always tried to do the
right thing. That over time, truth would win out, justice would
prevail, right would triumph over might, your vote would count, and the
'Big Lie' could not succeed in our society with it's "free press" and
constitutional checks and balances.
In less then three years
everyone one of these beliefs has been shattered and I no longer hold
such childish illusions. The evil that our nation is committing is
assuredly being done in the name of the majority of its people, the
'Big Lie' has won out over truth, justice has not been done, might
triumphed over right, and our votes certainly didn't count. It is quite
obvious to me that a majority of my fellow Americans would rather
believe in comfortable and convenient fictions then face horrible
truths. This self-deception, the ability to delude oneself through half
truths or it's hand maiden 'plausible deniability', the ability to
self-select your own ignorance, in light of recent events appears to be
the main constituents of America's governance and foreign policy.
What has occurred during
these three years is evil pure and simple. What the United States is
committing is the rape of a country for its oil using the remarkably
well-timed tragedy of 9/11 as its justification. Lets us be quite clear
about this. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. (101) Iraq had no weapons
of mass destruction for many years prior to this invasion.
(102)(103)(104) Iraq and Saddam's regime never had a relationship with
Al Qaeda. (105)(106) But there ARE people who did and many of them have
yet to be brought to account.
The Three Players:
Elements in the current
administration had been planning the invasion of Iraq since the first
Gulf war in 1992. the Bushes, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Pearl, Rumsfeld,
Ashcroft and others whom we'll refer to as the Texas Cabal.(107)(108)
Some of these men represented firms who sold Saddam weapons before the
first Gulf war. One of them in particular, Rumsfeld represented a firm
that sold Saddam biological weapons of mass destruction, (109) George
Bush Sr. himself enabled Saddam to obtain biological and chemical
weapons prior to the first gulf war (110) Perhaps it's why these
'gentleman' were so convinced Saddam still had these weapons. The Texas
Cabal for the last 10 years has had and continues to have investments
in companies which are currently reaping enormous profits from the war
and will do so in it's aftermath, well known names such as,
Halliburton, Kellog Brown & Root, Blackwater, etc.(111)
. "The Saudi sheiks have
been Wahhabis since they intermarried with the Family of a puritanical
Muslim scholar, Mohammed ibn Abd al-Wahhab, in 1774. Supported first by
Britain and later by the United States, the Saudis captured the Muslim
holy cities of Mecca and Medina, easily gaining control of the entire
Arabian peninsula." (112) The Saudis continue to support Whabbisim, the
xenophobic anti-western offshoot of Islam that provides the religious
foundation for most of the Sunni terrorists organizations in the Middle
East, including Al Qaeda. The Saudis also support and maintain the
Madrassas, schools where Whabbisin is taught and were many terrorists
are recruited, supported and trained.
Many parties including the
C.I.A., the Saudis, of course, Pakistan and others had financed Al
Qaeda when it was fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. "In 1989, bin
Laden established al Qaeda (the Base) in Afghanistan to organize
extremist Wahhabis and disperse their networks throughout the
country".(112) Later after moving back to Saudi Arabia, and then
leaving for the Sudan after King Faud allowed in American troops to
fight Saddam in the first Gulf war, Osama lambasted the royal family
for allowing the infidels to occupy the holy land. Through a series of
never ending and proliferating "charities" established and supported by
banks and business connected to the Saudi, bin Laden, and Bush families
and members of the Texas Cabal, Osama continued to receive much of his
funding during the eighties and early nineties. (112)(113) Today he
still continues to receive much of his funding from the Saudis.
The Facts & Bill of
Particulars :
It has been reported by
many that the Bushes, Cheney, the Texas Cabal, the Saudis and the bin
Ladens have interlocking financial, business, banking and close
personal relationships and have had them for the last twenty to thirty
years as typified by companies such as BCCI, the Carlyle group etc.
(110)(113)(111)(120)(115)(116)(117)
Before 9/11 when the
administration first assumed office they immediately eliminated any
laws that would have provided oversight into their activities. They got
rid of the special prosecutor act, weakened the freedom of information
act, refused to join or abide by the U.N. court regarding crimes
against humanity, changed the federal statues to reclassify almost all
federal documents top secret (118), took any FOIA request regarding
their meetings, such as Cheney's energy task force all the way to the
Supreme Court to block these requests. etc. etc.(119)
Prior to 9/11 the Bush
administration prevented the FBI from investigating the Saudis and bin
Ladens, deliberately "spiking investigations"(120) or "telling them to
back off"(121) in their inquires regarding several known terrorists of
the bin Laden clan. Also prior to 9/11 the Bush Administration
deliberately undermined and under funded anti-terrorism efforts within
the U.S. despite repeated warnings of possible Al Qaeda attacks
(122)(123). These warnings came from many officials and sources who had
determined Al Qaeda was the "imminent threat" but their pleas were
continuously ignored.(124), whereas Bush in his push for war prior to
9/11 claimed Iraq was the "imminent threat" a claim which at the time
was refuted by George Tenent, director of the CIA [cc](125). Former
Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill told 60 Minutes that regime change in
Iraq was the main topic at the very first meeting of Bush's National
Security Council - a full eight months before 9/11. O'Neill said, "It
was all about finding a way to do it". That was the tone of it. The
president saying 'Go find me a way to do this'"(107) And this testimony
was later confirmed to ABC news by another official who attended the
same meeting.(126)
On April 30 2001 the Bush
Administration specifically removed Osama bin Laden from the U.S's
annual terrorism report, reports that in prior years had prominently
featured Osama bin Laden as one of the leading terrorists. (127) The
Bush Administration, unlike it's predecessor, also somehow failed to
use the predator surveillance program to its full effectiveness in
tracking down Osama bim Laden in Afghanistan, they did not use it at
all for the first eight months of the administration, and when they
did, they did not deploy the armed predator until after 9/11. This
inaction was supposedly due to internal debates. (128) In the months
prior to 9/11 the Bush administration also curtailed a Justice
Department program to monitor Al Qaeda activity in the U.S. called
"Catchers Mitt" (129)
Prior to 9/11 in 2001, John
Ashcroft overruled FBI directors Louis Freeh's attempt to make
terrorism a U.S. priority. In a speech Mr. Freeh was to give before FBI
special agents a participant stated that "Ashcroft didn't want to hear
about it" when Freeh told Ashcroft those were his intentions. (130)
Ashcroft reduced anti-terrorism funding in the year before 9/11 by 23%
in his first month in office (131) This is the same John Ashcroft who
two months prior to 9/11 began traveling by privately leased aircraft
at the U.S.'s expense, and refused to fly on the commercial airlines.
(132) In the week after 9/11 Bush allowed members of the bin Laden and
Saudi families to leave the U.S. without being questioned by the FBI,
thereby severely crippling any chance to investigate who was supporting
Al Qaeda and what connections there were between Al Qaeda and elements
or groups within the U.S. (133) That days after 9/11 the Bush
administration had already made the decision to invade Iraq(119) "using
the terrorist attacks as justification [for the invasion] despite
having [any] proof that Iraq had any connection to Al Qaeda or 9/11"
(134)
That the very people who
would reap profits from this invasion like Mr. Perle (116) , when
approached with peace feelers from Saddam's representatives not
surprisingly didn't meet with them (135) That on Feb. 6, 2002 the CIA
told the White House there was "no evidence" that Iraq has engaged in
terrorist operations in nearly a decade and that the agency was
convinced that Saddam had not provided any WMD to Al Qaeda or other
related groups.(136) That after 9/11 the bush Administration did every
thing they could to ignore Osama bin Laden and Afghanistan in their
eagerness to go after Iraq. (137) even including diverting critical
resources in the hunt for Osama bin Laden from U.S. forces based in
Afghanistan (137) That after our invasion a lengthy search, which cost
over 300 million dollars by over 1,200 WMD specialists in Iraq yielded
nothing. (102) After the invasion of Iraq was complete the White house
selected it's own people to investigate why their were "intelligence
failures" regarding Iraq's alleged WMD. Unusually in this case all the
commission [dd] members were exempted from the standard background
checks designed to avoid conflicts of interest. (138) Bush "negotiated"
a session of less then one hour of testimony in front of the 9/11
commission and would only appear if Vice President Cheney accompanied
him to the meeting.
The Coincidences :
It is highly implausible
that during the ten years of meetings and contacts together between the
Saudis, bin Ladens, Bushes, Cheney and the Texas Cabal, that the future
conquest of Iraq, and the disposition of Iraq's hundreds of billions of
dollars worth of oil, was never discussed. (108) It is also equally
improbable that no one mentioned how the U.S. was to be induced to
carry out its role as the invading power, and how this 'inducement' was
to be accomplished.
Is it merely coincidental
that prior to 9/11 these discussions were held with the Saudis the very
people who were providing succor, support and direction for Al Qaeda?
Is it coincidental that enormous profits were to be generated for all
the parties concerned due to their already mentioned interlinked
investments once a war started? And to start this war an 'inducement'
was needed? Was it accidental that the investigations into the bin
Ladens and Saudis prior to 9/11 were "spiked" and the investigators
were told to "back off" by the Bush administration? Is it a random
series of events that the elimination of Saddam and the occupation of
Iraq has increased Saudi power and security, and the war and it's
aftermath have increased Bush's and the Texas Cabal's power and wealth.
Are all the facts already mentioned in the proceeding paragraphs just
accidents of chance? Is the reason why the Saudis have never been
investigated after 9/11 because, as the administration so vehemently
states, "they're our friends"? Whose friends are they?
Those Who Forget History
.... :
Are we to believe that none
of these coincidences have anything to do with 9/11? Much to my
surprise many Americans believe they don't (139)(140) Perhaps it's
because they have forgotten some of history's lessons?
What was 9/11? Was it the
Reichstag Fire, which justified crystal nicht and the start of WW II?
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which justified and initiated the start
of the Vietnam War? "That dastardly attack" on the Main..."Remember the
Main", which justified the Spanish American War? A war whose fires were
stoked by the jingoistic articles of newspaper tycoon William Randolph
Hearst, as in an eerie parallel, the Iraq war has been inflamed by the
articles of newspaper tycoon Rupert Murdock. Is all of this just an
unfortunate, amazing, completely accidental occurrence of facts and
circumstances? Of course it is says the media, it's nothing to worry
our little heads about.
Are we the conquistadors,
'bringing salvation to the heathens' while slaughtering, and enslaving
them and stealing their gold? No, says the media, we are 'bringing
democracy to the unenlightened' while 'pacifying' the population and of
course 'using their oil to help in the rebuilding process'.
Are we Cecil Rhodes carving
out a personal empire once known as Rhodesia with a private army of
well-paid mercenaries using, at the time, the brand new Maxim gun to
obliterate the Zulu savages? No, says the media, unlike Mr. Rhodes the
Texas Cabal and Cheney will use their 25,000 "contractors", paid with
Iraq's own oil at the rate of $30,000 to $40,000 a month to control
Iraq's destiny only after U.S. troops, much cheaper because they are
paid with U.S. taxpayer dollars, 'suppress' the Arab 'terrorists' with
the most modern instruments of power ever seen while of course
'sacrificing' 'for the good of their country' their own lives in the
process.
The Shame :
Is there no shame? It is
amazing to see how the tragic circumstances and coincidences of 9/11
fit so neatly into the plans of those needing a pretext to go to war
with Iraq. For the last ten years in reading about government and
corporate corruption in the United States, I note with dismay the small
number of whistle blowers that have come forward, and of those a
disproportionate number of who are woman. Is this because they aren't
part of the 'old boy's network'? Is it perhaps because of those who do
come forward, all have suffered the consequences of their honesty and
integrity (141). What are we to make of this. Is their any one in this
country who is not motivated by greed, or more chillingly, by their
fear of retribution? What is our nation becoming?
And what about the media,
the 'watch dogs of our nation'? What about them? I can understand the
greedy motives of the rich and powerful but the spineless, ineffectual,
sycophantic, self-serving useless doggerel being passed off as news
these days by the 'forth estate' is a disgrace to our forefathers and
all those newsman who have endangered and even lost their lives in the
past to report the truth.
And why has the government
made it so difficult for the families of the 9/11 victims to
investigate the Saudis connections to this tragedy? Who are the people
in this country who make these decisions? If you 'arrange for things'
to happen, does that mean you are somehow no longer culpable for them,
is that how it works here? It's not the way I was brought up or taught.
If I have a rich friend,
one who has another friend who carry's a grudge, and that friend
commits a crime. A crime enabled by the most fortuitous circumstances
over which I have control, a crime which 'happens' to profit me and my
rich friend's interests, and I have made and continue to make every
effort to protect my rich friend from scrutiny, is the one with the
grudge, the one encouraged and supported by my rich friend, the one who
is....how shall we say... oooh so easy to manipulate, is he and only he
the one to be held to account? Are we that gullible, has anyone ever
heard of an 'agent provocateur'? Does the term 'setup' mean anything to
anyone? How about the term 'murder for hire'? Heck they were just a
bunch of New Yorkers... right? Is that how it works in this country? Is
this considered cleverness in America? Or justice? Or morality?
Can this country possibly
be that venal or stupid?. My attitudes are much more simplistic, some
would even say childish, if 9/11 was 'arranged' to happen than
everyone, especially every single Federal employee, who impedes, covers
up, delays, runs interference, shreds documents, hides the facts, lies,
distorts or twists the evidence in any way, is obstructing justice and
should be considered a collaborator and an accessory after the fact in
the murder of over 3,500 Americans. After all isn't this what Bush
himself said and I quote "Anyone who gives a dollar, or offers support
to a terrorist is a terrorist themselves". There are no excuses.
I suggest however, to put
to rest these terrible doubts all the current administration would have
to do is appoint an impartial independent special prosecutor....... oh
I forgot they got rid of the special prosecutor act before 9/11 didn't
they, how forgetful of me, how 'fortuitous' for them. Oh well.....
drats, I guess it doesn't matter then does it?
The Bitter Harvest :
And so I have lost my faith
in America, it is why I've written this letter, I will never agree with
this war and the horror that led up to it. To the incestuous
relationships between the players involved, Al Qaeda, the Saudis, the
administration and the Texas Cabal. I will never agree with this wars
continued prosecution and the needless, useless, profane waste of lives
it entails.
We have already gone down
this road to "win the hearts and minds" of another people in another
place and time, it was called Vietnam. At least we embarked on that
terrible journey for ideological and geopolitical reasons, but to make
the same mistake again, and to do it for the greed and personal power
of a few is unconscionable. Any actions we take from now on regarding
the Middle East and Iraq are forever tainted and doomed to failure by
the corrupt circumstances that led up to this war. We are building a
house on a foundation of lies and deceit in a sea of sand amongst a
hostile, resentful, occupied people and it will be swept away to our
utter ruin. We are 'harvesting fruits from the poisonous tree', and a
bitter, bitter harvest it will be.
======================================================================
Footnotes :
(101) The Progress Report
January 11, 2004 "National Security" Cheney's latest distortion
(102) The Daily Mis-Lead
"Bush's Evidence for War in Iraq Remains Illusory" 10-08-2003
<http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1344939&l=6127
>
(103) The Daily Mis-Lead
"Bush Admits Misleading on WMD" 01-27-2004
<http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1344939&l=16074
>
(104) The Progress report
January 28, 2004 "Intel Warnings Ignored"
(105) The Daily Mis-Lead
01-23-2004 "Cheney Cites Leaked Intelligence on Iraq-Al Qaeda"
<
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1344939&l=15588 >
(106) The Progress Report
02-22-2004 "Cheney Discredited by His Own Weapons Inspector"
(107) The Daily Mis-Lead
01-12-2004 "Former treasury say War in Iraq was Planned Before 9/11"
<
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1344939&l=14345 >
(108) By Greg Palast,
exerpt from Greg Palast "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" 04-26-2004
@ AlterNet :
(109) CBS 60 minutes 4/25/04
(110) "The Barreling
Bushes" L. A. Times by Kevin Phillip
<
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-op- >
<
phillips11jan11,0,1130619.story?coll=la-sunday-commentary >
(111) NYT Columnist: "The
Halliburton Shuffle" January 30, 2004 By Bob Herbert
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/opinion/30HERB.html?
(112) Michelle Mairesse
"Ancestral Voices" RCVD 03-24-2004
(113) The Progress Report
4/23/2004 "Saudi Arabia -Under the Influence : The BCCI-Bush-
Saudi- Terrorist Nexus"
(114) The Progress Report
March 11, 2004 "The Saudi Connection"
(115) The Progress report
January 23, 2004 "Halliburton : Company unfairly maligned
denying his connections".
(116) New Yorker Magazine
03-17-2003 "Lunch with the Chairman : Why was Richard Perle
meeting with Adnan
Khashoggi?" by Seymour Hersh
(117) The Daily Mis-Lead
04-21-2004 "Bush Still has Not Explained Ties to Saudi Arabia"
(118) NYT "Secrecy : The
Bush Byword" 3/28/03
<
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/28/opinion/28FRI3.html?ex=1049964968&ei=1&
en >
(119) "The Fruits of
Secrecy" New York Times 11-08-2003
(120) 2004 Newsweek, Inc.
by Martin Yant "Enron played key role in events presaging war" RCVD
03-24-2004
(121) "FBI and Spy Agents
Say Bush Spiked Bin Lauden Probes before 11 September" by Greg
Palast,
http://www.GregPalast.com
(122) The Progress Report
03-22-2004 "9/11-Warnings Ignored"
(123) The Progress Report
04-12-2004 "FYI, The PDB Doesn't CYA"
(124) The Progress Report
03-25-2004 "9/11-Clark Withstands Scrutiny"
(125) The Daily Mis-Lead
"Tenet Exposes Bush's Misleading on WMD"
<
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1344939&l=17046 >
(126) The Daily Mis-Lead
01-14-04 "Official Confirms Bush Plotting Iraqi Invasion Before 9/11"
<
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1344939&l=14452 >
(127) Source: CNN, 4/30/01;
AP, 6/29/01]
(128) Source: AP, 6/25/03
ex=1049964968&ei=1&en]
(129) Source: Newsweek,
3/21/04]
(130) Source: Newsweek,
5/27/02]
(131) The Progress Report
04-13-2004 "Ashcroft Slashed Counter Terrorism in His First Month In
Office"
(132) Source: CBS, 7/26/01]
(133) Source: Salon,
3/11/04; NBC, 9/7/03; Chicago Tribune, 9/19/01]
(134) The Daily Mis-Lead
"New Evidence that Bush Pushed Iraq War right after 9/11"
(135) New York Times
11-06-2003 "Diplomacy : Iraq Said to Have Tried to Reach Last-
Minute Deal to Avert War"
by James Risen.
<
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/06INTE.html >
(136) The Progress Report
01-28-2004 "CIA warnings ignored"
(137) The Daily Mis-Lead
04-06-2004 "New Evidence Bush Pushed Iraq War Right After 9/11"
<
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1344939&l=26544 >
(138) NYT Intelligence
Panel's Finances Will Stay Private February 15, 2004 By Eric Lichtblau
<
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/15/politics/15PANE.html? >
<
ex=1077914846&ei=1&en=3f818ac9d1c589af >
(139) Washington Post Poll:
Saddam Hussein and the Sept. 11 Attacks Saturday, September 6, 2003
(140) The Progress Report
April 23, 2004 "Americans Still Misled"
(141) New York Times
03-30-2004 Op-Ed "This Isn't America" by Paul Krugman
I owe a debt of gratitude
and most of my footnotes to "Truth & Consequences" 04-22-2004 DOC,
RTF, PDF The Progress Report @ progress@americanprogress.com , The
Daily Mislead. and of course many other authors such as Bernard
Weiner's "Up, Up B.S. Away" and Michelle Mairesse and her posting at
http://www.hermes-press.com
Revisions :
[aa] added {08-06-04}
[bb] second largest
producer changed to second largest proven reserves {08-06-04}
[cc] FBI changed to CIA
{06-20-04}
[dd] 9/11 commission
changed to commission (it was a separate body) {06-20-04}
[ee] deleted the e-mail
address {08-29-04}
[ff] It appears it's not an
original idea. If you check out Michelle Mairesse's postings you'll see
it's specifically mentioned back in 2002. {08-21-2004}
[gg] How could I forget to
include it, I’m sorry {04-04-05}
[hh] How could I forget to
mention those facts…I goofed. I did not mention the author’s name
because I’m not sure he desires to be associated with this letter.
{05-08-05}
[ii] Brilliant article:
predicted everything the Bush administration did, and will do. Just
didn’t see it till recently. {05-08-05}
MAILING LOG
oped@nytimes.com 05-26-04
06-01-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
letters@latimes.com
05-26-04 06-01-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
oped@washpost.com 05-26-04
06-01-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
newcomba@csps.com 05-26-04
06-01-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
online@tnr.com 05-26-04
06-01-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
english@mondediplo.com
05-26-04 06-01-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
letters@economist.com
05-26-04 06-01-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
post@pravda.ru 06-01-04
06-20-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
letters@suntimes.com
06-01-04 06-20-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
letters@iht.com 06-01-04
06-20-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
mike@michaelmoore.com
06-01-04 08-07-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
feedback@hindustantimes.com
06-20-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
letters@deccanherald.co.in
06-20-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
letters@waterford-today.ie
06-20-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
opinion@japantimes.co.jp
06-20-04 06-26-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
letters@guardian.co.uk
06-20-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
sfoxwell@npr.org 06-20-04
07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
writeback@belfasttelegraph.co.uk
06-20-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
editorial@progressive.org
05-26-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-0409-21-2004
news@irish-times.com
06-26-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
editorial@unison.ie
06-26-04 07-23-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
Letters@GlobeAndMail.ca
06-26-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
pjorne@worldtimes.com
06-26-04 08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
euobs@euobs.com 06-26-04
08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
edrgroup@europarl.eu.int
08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
dgreenhalgh@motherjones.com
08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
vision@2020vision.org
08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
contact@aeu.org 08-07-04
08-29-04 09-21-2004
hinson@grassrootspolicy.org
08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
news@freepressinternational.com
08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
pra@igc.org 08-07-04
08-29-04 09-21-2004
liberalslant@entermail.net
09-21-2004
info@FightTheBias.com
09-21-2004
liberalopinion@people.com
09-21-2004
contact@liberaloasis.com
09-21-2004
lemail@politicalstrikes.com
09-21-2004
letters@prospect.org
09-21-2004
info@defenddemocracy.org
09-21-2004
brent@brentflynn.com
09-21-2004
grose@cfr.org 09-21-2004
editor@nsnews.com 08-29-04
09-21-2004
stleters@sundaytimes.co.za
08-29-04 09-21-2004
letters@mg.co.za 08-29-04
09-21-2004
editor@middleastimes.net
08-29-04 09-21-2004
krinvestigation@krwashington.com
08-29-04 09-21-2004
editor@scoop.co.nz 08-29-04
09-21-2004
letters@haaretz.co.il
09-21-2004
editor@ipsnews.net
09-21-2004
editor@tompaine.com
09-21-2004
infor@independent.org
09-21-2004
Al Jazeera 09-21-2004
PBS 09-21-2004
NBC News 09-21-2004
ABC News 05-26-04 08-07-04
08-29-04 09-21-2004
DW Wrold DE 05-26-04
08-07-04 08-29-04 09-21-2004
Salon.com 05-26-04 08-07-04
08-29-04 09-21-2004
Chicago Tribune 05-26-04
08-07-04 09-21-2004
Boston.com 06-01-04
08-07-04 09-21-2004
M.P.G.
San Francisco, CA.
===================================================================
Bottom of Form