MPG
San Francisco, CA
Various Blogs - Mailings one through seven
Seventh mailing Date : 08-29-04

Author's Note :

This letter was written before the terrible events that took place in Besan Russia. I cannot express enough my sorrow for the Russian people, and my disgust and anger at the Chechen terrorists. It is well known that the Saudis support the "government" forces in the Sudan who have killed hundreds of thousands of Africans who refused to have Islam imposed upon them. It's why, despite Powell's supposed "pleas" nothing has been done so far. I will have to investigate to see just how much funding the Chechens also get from the Saudis. 09-05-2004 MPG

========================================================================= ==============================
Date: 08-29-2004

I still have not received any responses, so I've given up and deleted my e-mail address from my letters. If you've received any replies besides the six mailings I've already sent, they're not mine. Either something is seriously wrong with my e-mail service, or you have received a lot of letters regarding the same issues I've written about and you can't, won't, or don't want to reply.

If the second reason is true, why have there been so few reports about these issues? The press is finally getting better at digging up the truth. Many articles have now appeared regarding Haliburton's malfeasance and the profit motive that drove this nation to war. There have also been several excellent articles proving it was official policies from the likes of Rumsfield that contributed to the Abu Gairab prison scandal.

But so far the U.S. press has had very little to say about the relationships between Al Qaeda, the Saudis, the bin Ladens, the Bushes and the Texas Cabal before 9/11. More specifically how these relationships contributed to the tragedy. Why? It's been almost three years since 9/11 occurred. One would think the members of the press have had a sufficient amount of time to do their investigations. Why the delay? What is wrong with the press? Is their reluctance to report on these issues due to their fear of retribution? Or do they think the issues are too complicated?

If it is the later perhaps I can help simplify them. Means plus motive plus opportunity equals the crime.

(the means); An easily denied agent provocateur funded by your rich friends.

(the motive); Hundreds of billions in oil money and the chance to create an empire stretching from Iraq through to the Caspian sea encompassing Iran and the several newly "freed" soviet oil rich states in the Caspian basin, ala Rudyard Kipling's "The Man Who Would be King"[ff]

(the opportunity) The dozens or hundreds of meetings the Bush's, Texas Cabal, Saudis and bin Ladens had together.

(the crime) 9/11.

I am not a policeman; I don't work for the NSA, FBI or CIA; I am not a reporter; I am not an investigator. What I fail to understand is why NO ONE, and I mean absolutely NO ONE WHO IS; is doing their job. Not even the most basic rudimentary investigative techniques have been used so far to apprehend the additional conspirators. The most fundamental of which would be to "follow the money", finding out who funded the 9/11 terrorists, who profited from their actions, and who facilitated their entry into the U.S.

Why did the 9/11 commission put off looking into these issues until "after the elections" Am I to conclude by their decision that the Bushes and the Texas Cabal will investigate themselves if they are reelected? Or their rich friends? I hardly think so!

We have already witnessed the tapes of the obscene abuse at Abu Gairab, and we have listened to Enron executives laughing over how they "{expletive} the grandmothers in California". Considering these revelations one would have to also assume there are tapes out there of the hundreds of meetings the Texas Cabal, Bushes, Saudis and the bin Ladens have had over the last ten years regarding their plans for the middle east. These tapes will eventually be made public, they always are.

If something is not done soon however the entire world will know that it is not just this administration, or the Republicans, or even elements within the U.S. government, who are involved in this cover-up, which they already suspect, but that the American people are also complicit in avoiding the hard truths about what has been done in their name, to profit the powerful few.

It has already been reported that the current administration is constructing a pipeline from the oil rich Caspian basin through Afghanistan to the Gulf. Also documents were released Friday 08-27-04 which outlined the current administrations plans for "regime change in Iran". As with Iraq it appears they've had these plans for over a decade or more. Also as with Iraq these plans were kept hidden and secret. Wouldn't it have been nice of them to tell us, before they ran for office; before they got into office; what they had in mind for this country and the rest of the world? If they had given an honest answer about upcoming events like 9/11, what would they have said? Perhaps "you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs".... Or an empire? Tell that to the families of the 9/11 victims. Or the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Iranians killed over the years.

Is it really all about the money? If so, how many more 9/11's must we endure? How many more Najifs? How many more Americans and Iraqis must die? How many more dictators must we put into power? How many more countries must be destroyed in the process. When is enough, enough? Will we continue to reward "our friends" the Saudis for supporting terrorists and "our friends" the Pakistanies for selling nuclear weapons technology to anyone willing to buy. Now that Pakistan has sold nuclear technology to Iran, "somehow without our knowledge" will a nuclear weapon be "fortuitously" used on U.S. soil, so that the U.S. will be "induced" to invade Iran? Will Kazakhstan be invaded next, Turkmenistan, or how about that "commie state" Venezuela? What excuse will the rich and powerful come up with next?

To invoke the name of a favorite Republican villain; our current leaders are not like "Willie Horton". No they certainly are not. Willie Horton didn't have wealthy friends who "arranged" for the murder of members of his own family. Willie Horton didn't provide cover for his wealthy friends allowing them to escape scrutiny or prosecution. Willie Horton didn't falsely accuse his neighbor’s next door of these murders so he could go rob and kill them. Willie Horton didn't coldly and methodically plan these events for more then a decade. No; that takes a very special group of people to do something like that.

========================================================================= =============================
Sixth Mailing 08-07-04

Well, I have still not received any replies, comments or insults from anyone since my first e-mail 05-24-2004. If you have received any replies, comments or insults purportedly from me, or using my e-mail address {deleted}[ee] or name, I didn't send them.


Regarding all the literature on 9/11 that I've been reading to date, no attempt is being made by anyone to answer simple and basic questions about the connections between Saudi Arabia, Al Qaeda, the bin Ladens, the Bush's, and the Texas Cabal. What did these people know before 9/11 and when did they know it especially in regards to who told what to whom.

Simple questions such as who ordered the bin Ladens and Saudis evacuated from the U.S. days after 9/11 and more importantly why? Who were those big short sellers of airline stocks on the Pacific stock exchange before 9/11 and who did the transactions? What happened in the meetings these guys have had together for the last twenty years? Does anyone have any tapes? etc. etc.

What the heck do you newspaper guys do all day? Sit in your chairs and twiddle your collective thumbs?

Let me suggest some terms you can use in your research and reporting.

Mercenary
War Profiteer
Money
Greed
Manipulation
Repression
Suppression
Propaganda
Lying
Spin
Special prosecutor
Criminal conspiracy.
Co-Conspirator.
Accessory after the fact
Obstruction of justice
White wash
Perjury
Subornation of perjury
Dereliction of duty
Refusal to obey an unlawful order
Collaborator
Crimes against humanity
War Criminal
Rape
Torture
Murder
Treason

I'll give you an example of how to use one of these terms. When the Abu Gairab prison scandal first broke I read an article in the San Francisco Chronicle describing some of the events that happened there as "forced copulation".... That isn't funny, if you think it's funny or have any trouble with the above terms please e-mail me so we can discuss it. In case you didn't know it, the correct term is rape. Many, many other articles have similar problems with their concepts, terms or statements... as do many of our government and corporate officials. Please consult the above list if you have any trouble.

To help you keep track of when I sent my letter and to whom I sent it to, I've also attached a spreadsheet at the end of this e-mail.

========================================================================= =============================
Fifth Mailing 07-23-2004

A note to everyone who gets this letter; since 05-26-2004 I have received no replies; none at all. Considering the veracity and accurateness of what I've written, keeping in mind it was sent before Fahrenheit 9/11, I would have expected at least a couple of replies. Also please note "Losing One's Faith 9/11 & Iraq" is the only document (besides one other unrelated document) [aa] I have ever sent out. If you get any others let me make it clear they are not from me.

Since 07-01-2004 the following events have occurred.

The 9/11 commission has reaffirmed their original conclusion that Iraq had nothing whatsoever to do with the tragedy of 9/11.

The Saudis have now offered amnesty to their Al Qaeda brethren.

CBS did an interview where it was stated that the entire bin Laden family "hates the United States"

I just recently learned that several months ago the bin Ladens announced their intentions to build the world's tallest building in one of the gulf states. Isn't it ironic that their "disowned" son Osama takes down the world trade center and using this 'incident' as an excuse, the U.S. starts a war with Iraq which will supply the bin Ladens with U.S. tax dollars from their investments in the Carlyle group and other defense contractors reaping enormous profits from the war, which the bin Ladens will in turn use to build their own symbol of power in the Arab world. All of this activity being 'facilitated' by the Bush administration, now how 'fortuitous' is that?

On one of the networks MSNBC or Fox, it was reported that the Bush administration is, one; going to "suspend the electoral process" in the event of a terrorist attack, and two; plans to merge the FBI and CIA into a combined organization under one "intelligence czar". Wow... if there is another attack by Al Qaeda.... Remember the people supported by the Saudis and bin Ladens for the last twenty years... the people who are friends of the Bush's and the Texas Cabal... if that happens the Bush administration et al will become dictators of the U.S. Considering what I've repeatedly sent you how "fortuitous" would that be.?

My question to the U.S. news organizations is, do you support the constitution of the United States? Are you actually going to let this happen?

========================================================================= ==============================
Fourth mailing 07-01-2004

Since 06-20-2004 the Supreme Court has ruled that the public has no right to find out what Chaney's "energy task force" was up to; Gee...... you're kidding, so we have no right to know what was perhaps a discussion, before 9/11, of invading a country with the world's second largest proven reserves {bb} and how to divvy up it's resources. Gee that would be embarrassing.

========================================================================= ==============================
Third mailing 06-20-2004

Since I sent my prior two e-mails the 9/11 commission has remarkably decided to state that there is no connection between Saddam's former regime and the tragedy of 9/11. Gee...... you're kidding, were did these officials get their courage from? Of course their conclusions were immediately disputed by the current administration. Are you guys in the press going to find out who in the administration owned what stocks in which companies before 9/11? And who in the administration was talking to whom in Saudi Arabia before 9/11? Are you going to follow the money, or does that scare you guys too much?

========================================================================= ==============================
Second mailing 06-01-2004

Please note since I sent my first e-mail less then a week ago two additional items have appeared in the press. One: Chaney has now been found to have "sheparded" all the Halliburton contracts for Iraq through the DOD's procurement process. And two: the 'terrorists' involved in the seizure of those foreign hostages in Saudi Arabia have now 'escaped' except for one who 'somehow' wound up in a coma and therefore can't testify or be questioned. Considering what I've written below, don't you guys find this faintly ridiculous? May I ask what are you doing about it all? Where's all the oil money from Iraq going? What members of the administration own stock in these companies?

It is getting close to the point where one could accuse many members of the press of a dereliction of duty.