12th mailing 06-06-05
al-Zarqawi, Al Qaeda the Media and the U.S.
As usual no replies
received, none sent besides this mailing number 12. If you’ve
received anything else, it wasn’t from me.
Before I sat down to watch
one of my favorite movies the other day, I saw two of our local “news”
i.e. “fanciful infotainment” stations spewing the same identical
doggerel about al-Zarqawi and Al Queda and literally gushing on and on
about how the US was “saving” the poor Iraqi people from this evil
monster.
If you’re seeing the same
garbage on your TV just keep in mind the articles listed below and Mr.
Reficul’s quote included in mailing number 10 from my first
conversation with him, “our true friends the Saudis will continue to
supply funds and resources to my agent provocateurs be they Al Queda or
some new incarnation. They'll provoke more incidents to keep the pot
bubbling [in Iraq]. Iran will be next, maybe the states in the
Caspian basin, maybe Nigeria, perhaps Venezuela. I'll have to
come up with new groups for those countries.”
Articles #1, #2, #3, #4 and
#5 detail how the Bush administration didn’t go after al-Zarqawi when
it had SEVERAL chances to do so, this was done under direct orders from
Bush himself. Please note that this failure was remarkably under
reported by our news media. Gee…… I wonder why?
Article #6 outlines how
convenient this all was for the Bush administration’s policies. Note it
also mentions how Rumsfeld backed off saying al-Zarqawi and al Qaeda
were connected to each other after George Tennent head of the CIA
issued a report saying there wasn’t any connection. Didn’t Mr.
Tennent also issue several other critical reports such as “a lack of
WMD” a “pessimistic outlook on the war in Iraq”, etc., was later fired,
the CIA purged, and he and his agency become the fall guy for the
U.S.’s “intelligence failures”? I wonder why? Hmmm.. it must be
one of those “fortuitous circumstances” right?
Articles #7 and #8 both
point out how al-Zarqawi and his band of merry men, the “Tawhid” were;
and basically still are, a group completely separate and apart from Al
Qaeda. The articles cover how al-Zarqawi was in Afghanistan where he
presumably received some CIA support. How he hates the Shias and
believes they are apostates. How he would serve as a perfectly good
U.S. foil to “divide”, a unified Iraqi resistance by his continuous
attacks against the Shias and thereby enable the U.S. to “conquer” all
three ethnic groups in Iraq. This is just another “fortuitous
circumstance” of course, along with how our press keeps saying Al Qaeda
when they really mean to say the Tawhid, Gee…… I can’t figure that one
out. Must be some sort of TV dubbing or voice over effect………… you
think?
Article #9 even suggests
that U.S. forces had captured al-Zarqawi AND THAN LET HIM GO.
What can I tell you;
another terrorist with admittedly tenuous connections to the CIA (this
time) one of whom we take every opportunity not to attack, one of whom
we may even have actually captured and than let go. A person who the
press has enlarged into this “BIG BAD MONSTER OUT TO GET US” a person
who probably obtains his support from the Saudis (unconfirmed as of
yet, I’m still researching) but is definitely a Sunni who believes that
the Shias are apostates. A person who is incorrectly described as an
“Al Qaeda terrorist” which the press, shuddering with fear, eyes
bulging in terror states “may attack us at any time”.
Gee he sounds exactly like
that “other” guy …. What was his name … Osama something, right?
Everyone should be grateful
however that unlike Osama, the bin Ladens and the Saudis, al-Zarqawi
doesn’t have a twenty to thirty year history of embarrassing
connections between himself and the Texas Cabal and Bush family.
Wow I just realized what
a.. dare I say it again; I just can’t help myself.. what a “fortuitous
circumstance” that is.
Think about it. The U.S.
government has already made preparations for a draft. This
administration has cleared the decks by purging the C.I.A, the one
organization that issued reports critical of their plans and the only
one capable of standing in their way. Rhumsfeld has now taken the
reigns of power at the Pentagon. The economy may go into the tank under
the increasing load of debt caused by this administration’s policies.
If there were another
attack on U.S. soil, our current government would be able to pass an
enabling decree much harsher then the Patriot Act, invoke the draft,
blame any economic difficulties caused by their policies and
mismanagement on the attack, and invade more countries,.. like Iran for
instance.
Such an attack and
subsequent invasion of Iran would strengthen the Saudis position and
power in the Gulf, Bush’s position and power in the U.S. and of course
would put the last remaining gulf state not under Bush’s control firmly
in his hands.
Wow, now wouldn’t that be
fortuitous?
As I’ve said in prior
personal letters I’ve written more then two years ago, ”isn’t it
interesting to see two such families who derive their wealth from the
oil industry arrive at such a sympathetic understanding?”
By the way there are many,
many, many other articles detailing this administration’s mendacity on
these issues.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200410070007
#1 Media Matters –
the radio factor – Media largely silent on WSJ report – 11-15-2004
http://slate.msn.com/id/2108880/
#2 Slate magazine –
Why Bush let Iraq’s top terrorist walk – Daniel Benjamin – 10-29-2004
http://zfacts.com/p/653.html
#3 Z Facts.com – Know
the Facts – Get the Source – Bush Failed to Attack Zarqawi – From
the Wall Street Journal – by Scott J Paltrow – 10-25-2004 – Page A-3
http://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/oct_2004/bush_failed_to_attack_zarqawi.html
#4 Lycos Tripod –
Bush Failed to Attack Zarqawi – From the Wall Street Journal – By Scott
J Paltrow – 10-25-2004 – Page A-3
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/
#5 NSNBC TV –
Avoiding Attacking suspected terrorist master mind –
By Jim Miklaszewski –
03-02-2004
http://www.brushtail.com.au/july_04_on/zarqawi_bush.html
#6 Brush Tail
Graphics – Is al-Zarqawi a false flag operator – Nick Possum –
07-01-2004
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/18/opinion/main618114.shtml
#7 CBS news – from
the Weekly Standard – Who is Abu Musab al Zarqawi –
Written by Robert S Leiken
& Steven Brook 05-18-2004
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0303-01.htm
Published on Wednesday, March 3, 2004 by Knight-Ridder
Doubts Cast on Efforts to Link Saddam, al-Qaida
by Warren P. Strobel, Jonathan S. Landay and John Walcott
http://www.global-conspiracies.com/saudi_suicide_bomber_claims_zarqawi_was_captured_then_released.htm
#9 Global
Conspiricies dot Com – Saudi Suicide Bomber Claims Zarqawi was
Captured, Then Released – by Alisha Ryu – 01-24-2005